Published by the MIT News Office at the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, Cambridge, Mass.
Interdisciplinary Research Encouraged in NRC Report Encouraging investigators from more than one discipline to collaborate on research could profoundly affect not only clinical medicine, surgery, and disease prevention, but the industrial economy as well in areas of pharmaceuticals, biotechnology and medical devices. Thus concluded a report recently released by the National Research Council and the Institute of Medicine, "Interdisciplinary Research: Promoting Collaboration Between the Life Sciences and Medicine and the Physical Sciences and Engineering," prepared by the Committee on Promoting Research Collaboration, cochaired by George B. Benedek, MIT's Alfred H. Caspary Professor of Physics, and Professor S. James Adelstein of Harvard Medical School. Progress in breaking down the boundaries between conventional disciplines has been slow, the report also says. The authors suggest that the revolution in our understanding and control of disease has come from advances in areas such as diagnostic instrumentation, medical devices, rational drug design, and synthetic and genetically engineered biological materialsÑcoupled with quantitative and computer-assisted mathematical analysis. A flow of people, knowledge, and inventions across conventional academic and industrial boundaries has been essential to these successes. Drawing on information gathered through hearings, interviews, and workshops, as well as a national survey of interdisciplinary research programs in biophysics and bioengineering, the committee made several recommendations: ¥Universities and Teaching HospitalsÑWhere possible, there should be financial support especially for short-term exploratory collaborations that may lead to external funding. Administrative policies should also promote interactions among normally separate internal departments. Faculty could also organize more effectively to conduct collaborative research by creating, for example, a cross-disciplinary "center," or gathering faculty with the relevant cross-disciplinary expertise into a single department. ¥Academic-Industrial RelationsÑAlthough academic-industrial interaction has become an important stimulus for interdisciplinary research, it has also highlighted such issues as conflicts of interest, the preservation of academic integrity, and the ownership of intellectual property. To facilitate collaborative research and technology transfer, the committee recommended establishing academic-industrial liaison programs and technology licensing offices that maintain clear guidelines for licensing and patent protection. ¥Federal Funding AgenciesÑAgencies such as the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, and the Department of Energy fund the great majority of basic research in the US. They are thus in a position to play a key role in encouraging collaborative research. This will require an adequate mechanism for evaluating interdisciplinary proposals. Agencies can direct funds into the support of cross-disciplinary sabbaticals and postdoctoral fellows. ¥Private FoundationsÑThese independent organizations can take advantage of their inherently greater flexibility to support innovative collaborative ventures, helping to explore new ideas and develop productive guidelines and models that could be adapted to other settings, including government agencies. A copy of this NRC report is available from the Board on Physics and Astronomy, National Research Council, 2101 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20418.